🧭 Dojo Compass
Module: Entrepreneurship, Market Execution and Scaling
Focus Area: Entrepreneurship and Scaling
Key Article Point
Technology creates enormous opportunities for SMEs, but there is often a structural mismatch between technology capability and commercial capability.
Many operating businesses have customers, distribution, industry knowledge, processes and cash flow but lack the technology capabilities needed to optimize their businesses.
At the same time, many technology companies and startups have excellent technology but struggle to build distribution, manage customers, operate businesses or turn technical capability into recurring commercial value.
The answer does not always need to be an acquisition.
A strategic tie-up can connect the two.
This creates a potentially powerful model in which an operating SME provides the commercial platform and a technology company provides the technological capability, with the parties sharing in the value created.
🎯 Key Challenge
Technology creates a problem as well as an opportunity for SMEs.
The problem is not simply that technology is changing rapidly.
It is that technology development and business development often occur in different organizations with very different capabilities.
Consider two businesses.
The first is an established SME. It has 200 customers, an experienced sales team, established suppliers, industry expertise and a strong reputation. It understands its market extremely well.
But its technology is outdated.
The second is a technology startup. It has developed an impressive AI application that could transform the SME’s operations. It has talented engineers and a compelling product.
But it has few customers, limited industry knowledge and little experience running a commercial organization.
Neither company possesses the complete capability required to capture the opportunity.
The SME could purchase the technology, but may not know how to develop or integrate it.
The technology company could attempt to sell its product directly to the market, but may spend years building sales capabilities, developing customer relationships and learning an industry it does not understand.
A conventional consulting or software-vendor relationship solves part of the problem.
But it can also leave substantial value on the table.
The technology company becomes a service provider.
The SME becomes a customer.
The relationship is transactional rather than strategic.
There is another possibility:
Combine the capabilities more closely and share the value created.
🥋 Dojo Solution
Build the Bridge Between Technology and Commercial Capability
A strategic technology tie-up is a relationship in which two businesses combine complementary capabilities without necessarily merging.
The basic equation is:
Technology + Operating Capability + Commercial Access = Shared Value Creation
The operating company may contribute:
- customers;
- distribution;
- industry expertise;
- operational infrastructure;
- data;
- regulatory knowledge;
- brand and reputation;
- sales capability;
- implementation capability.
The technology company may contribute:
- software;
- AI;
- intellectual property;
- technical expertise;
- product development;
- automation;
- data science;
- engineering capability.
The parties then agree how the resulting value will be created and shared.
This is fundamentally different from simply purchasing technology.
The SME is not merely buying a tool.
The technology company is not merely selling a tool.
They are creating a commercial relationship around the application of the technology.
This can also reduce risk.
An SME does not necessarily have to make a large upfront investment in uncertain technology.
A technology company does not necessarily have to build an expensive sales and operating organization before discovering whether its technology works commercially.
Both parties can learn before committing more capital.
🏗️ Putting It into Practice
Step 1. Identify the Business Problem Before Looking for Technology
The starting point should not be:
“What technology should we buy?”
It should be:
“Where could technology materially increase the value of our business?”
Look for problems involving:
- high labor costs;
- slow processes;
- poor customer service;
- excess inventory;
- inefficient procurement;
- weak forecasting;
- low asset utilization;
- pricing;
- fraud or risk;
- regulatory compliance;
- customer acquisition;
- customer retention;
- product development.
The objective is to identify an economic opportunity, not simply adopt fashionable technology.
For example, an agricultural distributor might discover that better demand forecasting could reduce inventory and improve margins.
A logistics company might identify route optimization as a major value opportunity.
A professional-services firm might identify AI-assisted document analysis as a way to increase capacity without proportionally increasing headcount.
The business problem provides the foundation for the partnership.
Step 2. Identify the Capability Gap
Once the opportunity is identified, determine what the SME cannot easily build itself.
This is the Capability Gap.
For example:
Business problem: Reduce inventory.
Required capability: Demand forecasting.
Internal capability: Excellent market knowledge but limited data science.
External capability: Technology company with forecasting technology.
The strategic question becomes:
“Who already possesses the capability we need, and what can we provide that they need?”
This second part is critical.
An SME should not approach a technology company merely as a customer.
It should ask what commercial asset it possesses that the technology company would otherwise have difficulty acquiring.
That might be:
- access to hundreds of customers;
- proprietary industry data;
- a distribution network;
- implementation expertise;
- regulatory knowledge;
- manufacturing capability;
- geographic access;
- industry credibility.
That is where the opportunity for a genuine strategic tie-up begins.
Step 3. Look for Reciprocal Value
A strong tie-up requires both parties to possess something valuable to the other.
A simple Strategic Tie-Up Matrix can help:
| Operating SME Provides | Technology Company Provides |
|---|---|
| Customers | Technology |
| Industry knowledge | Product development |
| Distribution | AI/software |
| Data | Technical expertise |
| Implementation | Product roadmap |
| Brand/reputation | Innovation |
| Market access | Scalability |
The strongest relationships occur where the capabilities are complementary rather than overlapping.
The SME should be asking:
“What would this technology company struggle to build without us?”
The technology company should be asking:
“What would this SME struggle to build without us?”
If the answers are compelling on both sides, there may be a strategic opportunity.
Step 4. Start Small
Do not begin with a large technology investment.
Begin with a defined experiment.
Choose:
- one product;
- one customer group;
- one geographic market;
- one operational process;
- or one measurable problem.
Establish a baseline.
For example:
Current cost: $2 million
Current processing time: 10 days
Current error rate: 8%
Then establish the target:
Target cost: $1.5 million
Target processing time: 5 days
Target error rate: 3%
Now the technology can be evaluated according to economic results rather than enthusiasm.
This is particularly important for SMEs because technology investments can fail for reasons that have nothing to do with whether the technology itself works.
The technology may work.
The business model may not.
Step 5. Choose the Right Economic Structure
There are many possible structures for a strategic technology tie-up.
Technology Licensing
The SME pays for the right to use the technology.
This is relatively straightforward but leaves most of the relationship transactional.
Revenue Sharing
The technology company receives a percentage of the revenue generated through the technology.
This aligns the parties around commercial success.
Performance-Based Payments
The SME pays based on measurable improvements—for example, savings generated, additional revenue or increased productivity.
This can reduce upfront risk.
Joint Venture
The parties establish a new business combining technology and commercial capabilities.
This can be appropriate where the opportunity is sufficiently large to justify a separate entity.
Equity Investment
The operating company may invest in the technology company, giving it economic exposure to the technology provider’s broader growth.
Conversely, the technology company might receive equity in a new venture created around the commercial application.
Minority Strategic Partnership
Neither party needs to acquire the other.
Instead, they establish a long-term strategic relationship with defined commercial rights, responsibilities and economic sharing.
This can provide much of the strategic benefit of an acquisition without the full financial and integration risk.
Step 6. Share the Upside, Not Just the Costs
One of the most interesting possibilities is moving beyond the traditional supplier/customer relationship.
Suppose a technology company develops an AI system that increases an SME’s gross profit by $2 million annually.
The SME could simply pay a software subscription.
But another structure might be more powerful.
The technology company could receive a percentage of the incremental value created.
Now both parties have an economic incentive to improve the system.
The technology company has an incentive to make the technology commercially successful.
The SME has an incentive to provide data, customers and operational support.
The relationship becomes:
Joint investment → Joint execution → Measurable value creation → Shared upside.
This can produce a much deeper relationship than conventional technology procurement.
Step 7. Design the Relationship to Evolve
A strategic tie-up should not be static.
A useful progression might be:
Phase 1 — Experiment:
Test whether the technology solves the problem.
Phase 2 — Integration:
Embed the technology into business processes.
Phase 3 — Commercialization:
Apply the combined capability to additional customers or markets.
Phase 4 — Expansion:
Develop additional products, geographies or applications.
Phase 5 — Structural Option:
Consider a joint venture, equity investment, acquisition or deeper strategic partnership if the opportunity warrants it.
This creates an important advantage:
The parties do not need to decide the ultimate relationship before they know whether the relationship works.
They can start with a limited relationship and build it if the relationship creates real business value and the chemistry between the parties is positive.
Step 8. Look for Technology Companies That Need a Business
This is perhaps the most overlooked opportunity for SMEs.
Technology startups often focus heavily on building technology.
But technology alone does not create a business.
A startup may have excellent engineers but limited ability to:
- sell;
- manage customers;
- enter regulated industries;
- implement technology;
- build distribution;
- manage operations;
- understand industry-specific problems.
An established SME can therefore become much more than a customer.
It can become the startup’s commercial platform.
This creates a potentially powerful proposition:
“You bring the technology. We bring the business.”
The two companies can then build something neither could easily build alone.
Step 9. Protect Against the Downside
Strategic tie-ups are not risk-free.
Important issues include:
- intellectual property ownership;
- data rights;
- cybersecurity;
- exclusivity;
- customer ownership;
- technology obsolescence;
- performance standards;
- investment obligations;
- termination rights;
- change of control;
- confidentiality;
- regulatory compliance.
The structure should therefore preserve flexibility.
Avoid committing the SME to a technology for five years simply because the technology looks promising today.
Where uncertainty is high, use:
shorter commitments + measurable milestones + staged investment + clear exit rights.
This allows the relationship to deepen as evidence accumulates.
📌 Key Takeaways
- SMEs do not necessarily need to acquire technology companies to access technology.
- The more interesting opportunity may be strategic tie-ups that combine technological and commercial capabilities.
- Many operating SMEs possess customers, distribution and industry expertise that technology companies desperately need.
- Many technology companies possess technical capabilities that operating SMEs cannot efficiently develop themselves.
- The strongest partnerships create reciprocal value rather than simply establishing a vendor/customer relationship.
- Start with a specific business problem and a controlled experiment.
- Use performance-based economics where appropriate to share risk.
- Revenue sharing, joint ventures, equity investments and strategic partnerships can create deeper alignment than conventional technology procurement.
- A technology company can become a partner in the SME’s business rather than merely a supplier.
- An SME can become a technology company’s route to commercialization rather than merely another customer.
- The relationship can evolve from experiment to integration to commercialization and, eventually, acquisition if that becomes the logical outcome.
- The objective is not to own the technology. It is to capture the value the technology can create.
🌿 Reflection
There is a tendency to think of technology adoption as a purchasing decision.
An SME identifies a technology, selects a vendor, negotiates a price and implements the product.
But some of the most interesting opportunities may lie outside this model.
Technology companies and operating companies possess different kinds of capital.
The technology company may have technical capital.
The SME may have commercial capital.
The technology company has engineers, intellectual property and innovation.
The SME has customers, relationships, market knowledge, distribution and the ability to execute in the real world.
Neither necessarily needs to acquire the other.
They may simply need to find a way to combine their assets.
This is particularly interesting for technology startups that discover that selling services is easier than building scalable products. A strategic relationship with an established operating business can give the technology company a real-world environment in which to deploy its technology, develop products around genuine customer problems and participate in the economic value created.
For the SME, the benefit is equally significant.
Instead of funding an uncertain technology project entirely on its own, it can share development risk with a technology partner whose interests are tied to successful commercialization.
The deeper principle is therefore:
Do not ask only whether you should buy technology. Ask who possesses the complementary capability that could allow you to create more value together than either business could create alone.
That question moves technology strategy from procurement toward business design.
And sometimes the most valuable technology deal is not an acquisition at all.
It is a relationship.
⚔️ Dojo Mission
Identify three areas of your business where technology could create substantial economic value.
For each, complete this five-part map:
1. Business Problem
What problem could technology solve?
2. Economic Value
If solved, how much additional revenue, cost reduction, productivity or risk reduction could it create?
3. Capability Gap
What technology or expertise do you lack?
4. Strategic Partner
Who might possess that capability—and what commercial asset could you provide in return?
5. Tie-Up Structure
Could you test the opportunity through licensing, revenue sharing, performance payments, equity, a joint venture or another strategic partnership?
Then ask one final question:
“Are we looking for a technology vendor, or are we looking for a partner with whom we can build a larger business?”
That distinction may reveal opportunities that a conventional technology procurement exercise would never find.
Leave a Reply