🧭 Dojo Compass
Module: Finance, Risk Management and Long-Term Resilience
Focus Area: Capital Raising
Key Article Point
Many businesses looking for growth capital make the same basic assumption: if their business plan is attractive enough, an investor will provide the money needed to execute it.
In practice, this is often not how capital raising works.
An investor may like the business but dislike the uncertainty surrounding future demand. A customer may desperately need additional supply but lack the capital to finance the expansion required to produce it. A producer may have the capabilities and assets necessary to expand but lack both capital and sufficient visibility regarding future sales.
Each party has something the others need.
The problem is that the parties often approach the situation as separate transactions.
A potentially powerful alternative is to connect them.
A customer or commercial partner can provide demand certainty. That demand certainty can reduce investment risk. Reduced risk can make the business more attractive to an external investor. New investment can increase production capacity. Increased capacity can strengthen the commercial relationship.
The result is a capital-raising triangle:
Commercial demand → lower investment risk → more attractive capital → greater productive capacity → stronger commercial relationship
This structure can convert commercial relationships into investment leverage.
🎯 Key Challenge
Businesses frequently try to raise capital while leaving the most important source of risk sitting outside the financing discussion: uncertainty about future commercial demand.
Consider a company seeking $20 million to expand production.
The company may have:
- strong technical capabilities;
- attractive margins;
- proven management;
- significant market opportunity; and
- a credible expansion plan.
But an investor may still ask:
Who will buy the additional production?
If the answer is “we expect demand to grow,” the investor is being asked to finance both the expansion and the market risk.
The company’s potential customers may see the situation differently.
They may know that they need additional supply and would be willing to purchase more product if sufficient capacity existed. But they may not want to invest directly in production. Their core competence may be sales and distribution rather than manufacturing or agriculture.
This creates a fundamental mismatch.
The producer needs capital because it lacks certainty regarding future demand.
The customer needs supply because it lacks production capacity.
The investor has capital but is reluctant to assume uncertain market risk.
The opportunity is to restructure the relationships so that each party contributes what it is best positioned to contribute.
Instead of asking an investor to finance an uncertain business plan, the parties can create a commercial arrangement that reduces uncertainty before—or alongside—the capital raise.
🥋 Dojo Solution
Connect commercial certainty with investment capital
A triangular investment structure generally involves three parties:
1. The producer or operating company
The company that has the assets, capabilities, technology, people or know-how needed to create the product or service.
2. The commercial partner
A customer, distributor, supplier, strategic buyer or other party that has a direct economic interest in the company’s future output or capacity.
3. The financing party
An equity investor, lender, strategic investor or other source of capital capable of funding the expansion.
The structure is powerful because each party addresses a weakness of another.
The producer provides capability.
The commercial partner provides demand visibility.
The investor provides capital.
The result can be substantially more attractive than any of the three parties acting independently.
The central insight is:
A commercial commitment that reduces market risk can increase the financeability and value of a business.
This is important because capital raising is fundamentally about risk-adjusted returns.
If an investor believes that a company has a 40% probability of achieving its projected revenues, it will demand substantial compensation for that uncertainty.
If a binding commercial arrangement materially increases confidence in those revenues, the investor’s required return may decline.
That can increase valuation, reduce financing costs or make the investment possible in the first place.
🏗️ Putting It into Practice
Step 1. Identify the company’s biggest financeability risk
Before approaching investors, determine what actually makes the business difficult to finance.
It may not be a shortage of assets or management capability.
The problem could be:
- uncertain future demand;
- customer concentration;
- commodity-price exposure;
- long development periods;
- regulatory uncertainty;
- foreign-exchange exposure;
- technology adoption;
- high upfront capital expenditure; or
- an uncertain exit.
Then ask:
Which of these risks could be reduced through a commercial relationship?
This is the first step toward building a capital-raising triangle.
Step 2. Identify the commercial party that benefits from expansion
Look downstream.
Who would economically benefit if the company could increase its capacity?
Depending on the industry, this could be:
- a major customer;
- distributor;
- retailer;
- manufacturer;
- technology platform;
- hospital system;
- logistics company;
- utility;
- property operator; or
- government-related purchaser.
The ideal commercial partner does not simply like the company.
It has a material economic need for what the company will produce or provide.
That distinction is critical.
A customer saying “we would like to buy more from you” is useful.
A customer willing to enter into a multi-year purchase agreement, minimum-volume commitment, capacity reservation, advance payment arrangement or other economically meaningful commitment is much more powerful.
Step 3. Convert commercial interest into risk reduction
The commercial relationship should be designed to address a specific investment risk.
For example:
Offtake agreement: A customer commits to purchasing a defined amount of future production.
Minimum-volume agreement: The customer guarantees a minimum level of purchases.
Long-term supply contract: The customer commits to a multi-year relationship.
Capacity reservation: The customer pays for or otherwise commits to future production capacity.
Pricing formula: The parties establish a mechanism that reduces uncertainty around future prices.
Advance payment: The customer provides funding before delivery, reducing working-capital requirements.
Joint venture: The commercial party invests directly alongside the operating company.
The appropriate structure depends on the business.
The important principle is that commercial arrangements should be designed with financeability in mind.
Step 4. Bring the financing party into the triangle
Once the commercial relationship has reduced a material business risk, approach the financing market with a different investment proposition.
Instead of:
“Invest $20 million because we believe demand will increase.”
the proposition becomes:
“Invest $20 million to expand capacity that will serve a commercially committed market.”
That is a fundamentally different risk proposition.
The investor can now evaluate:
- committed revenue;
- expected production;
- margins;
- customer creditworthiness;
- contract duration;
- pricing mechanisms;
- remaining market exposure;
- expansion economics; and
- potential upside beyond contracted demand.
The commercial agreement does not eliminate risk.
It changes the composition of risk.
The investor may now be exposed primarily to execution, production and customer-performance risk rather than speculative demand risk.
That distinction can materially improve the financing case.
Step 5. Design the triangle so everyone benefits
The triangle should not simply transfer risk from one party to another.
It should create genuine economic benefits for all three parties.
For the operating company, benefits might include:
- new capital;
- greater production capacity;
- improved revenue visibility;
- lower financing costs;
- better asset utilization; and
- stronger long-term growth.
For the commercial partner, benefits might include:
- secure supply;
- predictable pricing;
- priority access to capacity;
- improved product quality;
- geographic diversification; and
- potential participation in upstream economics.
For the investor, benefits might include:
- lower demand risk;
- more predictable cash flows;
- improved downside protection;
- clearer underwriting assumptions; and
- potential upside from growth beyond contracted demand.
The structure works best when the triangle creates mutual reinforcement rather than merely contractual complexity.
Step 6. Think beyond the initial financing
The most interesting effect may be that the triangle becomes self-reinforcing.
Commercial certainty attracts capital.
Capital creates capacity.
Capacity improves service.
Improved service strengthens the commercial relationship.
A stronger commercial relationship creates greater revenue visibility.
Greater revenue visibility can attract additional capital on better terms.
Over time, this can create a virtuous cycle:
Demand → financeability → investment → capacity → execution → stronger demand → stronger financeability
This can also change the company’s strategic position.
A company that previously had to raise capital based primarily on forecasts may eventually be able to raise capital against demonstrated commercial relationships and contracted future cash flows.
Its cost of capital may fall.
Its valuation may rise.
Its ability to pursue additional opportunities may increase.
The commercial relationship has therefore become more than a source of revenue.
It has become part of the company’s capital strategy.
Intuitive Examples
Agriculture provides an intuitive example.
Imagine a supermarket group in China that expects rapidly growing demand for premium olive oil but has difficulty securing sufficient supply.
An Italian olive-oil producer has the production capabilities but needs capital to expand.
An investment fund has capital but is reluctant to finance a production expansion without greater certainty regarding future demand.
The three parties could potentially establish a structure in which:
- the supermarket commits to purchasing a defined amount of production;
- the Italian producer uses that commitment to support expansion financing;
- the investment fund provides the capital required for expansion; and
- the supermarket receives greater supply and pricing visibility.
The same logic can apply far beyond agriculture.
A manufacturer could obtain a long-term purchase commitment from an industrial customer before financing a new plant.
A technology company could secure multi-year contracts before raising growth capital to build its infrastructure.
A renewable-energy project could combine long-term offtake arrangements with project financing.
A healthcare operator could secure institutional demand before financing new capacity.
A logistics company could obtain long-term customer commitments before investing in additional warehouses or vehicles.
The industry changes.
The principle does not.
📌 Key Takeaways
- Capital raising and commercial strategy should not always be treated as separate activities.
- A major obstacle to financing is often market uncertainty, particularly uncertainty regarding future demand.
- Customers and strategic partners can sometimes reduce that uncertainty through contractual or investment commitments.
- A commercial commitment can therefore become a financing asset.
- A three-party structure can align operating capability, commercial demand and financial capital.
- The objective is not merely to transfer risk but to reduce total system risk.
- Structures can include offtake agreements, minimum-volume commitments, capacity reservations, pricing formulas, advance payments and joint ventures.
- A commercial relationship may improve valuation by making future cash flows more predictable.
- The concept applies across sectors, including manufacturing, technology, energy, healthcare, logistics, infrastructure and real estate.
- The strongest structures create a self-reinforcing cycle in which commercial certainty attracts capital, capital creates capacity, and capacity strengthens the commercial relationship.
- The deeper strategic lesson is that relationships can be used to reshape the risk profile of an investment—and therefore its financeability.
🌿 Reflection
Entrepreneurs often think about capital raising as a search for money.
Investors think about it as a search for risk-adjusted returns.
Customers think about it as a search for reliable products or services at acceptable prices.
These perspectives can appear incompatible.
But they do not have to be.
A customer that commits to future purchases can reduce an investor’s market risk. An investor that provides capital can allow the producer to meet the customer’s needs. The producer’s increased capacity can then make the customer more willing to commit.
The three interests reinforce each other.
This suggests a broader principle for capital raising:
Do not ask only who has money. Ask who can help reduce the risks that make your business difficult to finance.
Sometimes the most valuable contribution a strategic partner can make is not an investment check.
It is a commercial commitment that makes someone else willing to write the investment check.
That is the essence of the capital-raising triangle.
⚔️ Dojo Mission
Take your next major capital requirement and draw a triangle with three points:
COMPANY — COMMERCIAL PARTNER — INVESTOR
For each point, write down:
- What does this party need?
- What risk prevents it from acting?
- What can the other two parties do to reduce that risk?
- What commercial or financial commitment could make that risk reduction credible?
Then redesign your capital-raising strategy around the triangle.
Do not begin by asking:
“Who will invest in us?”
Begin with:
“Who has an economic interest in our success, and what commitment could that party make that would materially reduce the risk for an investor?”
You may discover that the fastest route to new capital is not finding a new investor.
It is changing the commercial structure of the business so that the investment becomes easier to make.
Leave a Reply